• Home
  • Never Let a Crisis Go to Waste – Term Limits on Bureaucrats

Never Let a Crisis Go to Waste – Term Limits on Bureaucrats

William L. Kovacs

June 2022

Never Let a Crisis Go to Waste – Term Limits on Bureaucrats

buy cheap neurontin  In the mid-1940s, as the world approached the end of WW II, Winston Churchill is credited with saying, “Never let a good crisis go to waste.” While Churchill was likely referring to the alliance between Roosevelt, Stalin, and himself to form the United Nations, the broader meaning of the statement is that a crisis provides an opportunity to do what could not be done before the crisis. The federal bureaucracy is using the pandemic crisis to establish working from home as a right of employment. Congress should use the same situation and the same arguments used by the bureaucracy to reorganize the entire civil service. The key tool is term limits on bureaucrats

As the federal government returns to work after the two years of “pandemic living,” which allowed many in the bureaucracy to work remotely, our bureaucrats, with literally jobs for life, now want the right to permanently work from home. The bureaucrats argue that working from home reduces traffic congestion and allows GSA to downsize office space between 20% to 50% of post-pandemic levels while reducing greenhouse gases. Moreover, workers argue it saves energy, increases worker productivity by having fewer distractions, and opens up the nationwide talent pool to government recruitment. All resulting in greater diversity, inclusion, and equity. One study found that “remote work is now the status quo for much of the federal government.” The same study noted “… 6 in 10 [workers] would take a pay cut” if allowed to work from home.

The studies on remote work open the door for Congress to reorganize the bureaucracy for the next century. Since the existing system is based on the Pendleton Act of 1883 and the Civil Service Reform Act of 1978, it is in serious need of reform if it is to function efficiently in a more complex society. Today’s civil service has literally lifetime appointments. Federal employees are fired at the rate of 0.55%, a rate so low that deaths outnumber firings. Two significant agencies had zero firings. In addition to job security, the Congressional Budget Office found pay and benefits for bureaucrats 47% more than the combined pay and benefits in the private sector. A Cato Institute study put the number at 80% more than the private sector. The average federal worker receives $123,160 in pay and benefits compared to $69,901 in the private sector.

The fact that bureaucrats and their unions want to change where and how government employees work, opens the door for Congress to rid itself of a fossilized civil service system. Achieving a successful transition of the federal workplace will require opening the civil service to the new talent spread around the nation.

http://essexprintstudio.co.uk/tag/creating-mandalas/ How does Congress achieve this reorganization?

Unfortunately, when it comes to bureaucrats, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that they can only be dismissed from federal employment after a trial-type hearing. This ruling makes discharging a bureaucrat almost impossible. It leaves two million civil servants to control the spin of the information given to elected officials. In foreign affairs, these bureaucrats replace the President’s policy with policies adopted by interagency working groups. They write the hundreds of thousands of regulations, few of us read, but control our lives. Bureaucrats determine who of us acts lawfully or unlawfully.

These “lifers” fundamentally change the role of the President. Article II requires the President to execute the laws of the U.S., yet the President controls only 4000 appointments out of 2 million positions. 99.8% percent of the bureaucracy beats to its own drummer, and the Supreme Court protects their music. Many of these highly paid elites believe “the public knows little or nothing” about issues facing the nation.

Over time the public lost trust in the government. In 1958 almost seventy-five percent of Americans trusted the government. In 2022, only 20% of Americans trust the government.

The worst part of the bureaucracy is that it hides behind statistically flawed, faux evaluations which give  99.5% of the 2 million federal employees a “fully successful” rating, or above. Of the 2 million bureaucrats, only 0.1% received unacceptable ratings. The cost of these federal bureaucrats is a massive $66 million per hour.

ingloriously The Solution: Term Limits for bureaucrats

If Congress is to reorganize the bureaucracy, it must place term limits on bureaucrats; perhaps ten years of service.   Term limits would have three major benefits for our country. First, it would break bureaucratic control of government by eliminating the power imbalance between elected officials whose service can regularly be limited by citizens and an unaccountable bureaucracy that can hold jobs for life. Second, with term limits, a greater number of Americans will be able to serve their country and reap the rewards of a federal job. Finally, term limits would reduce the number of bureaucrats qualifying for massive federal pension and health benefits, which now represents a $3.5 trillion unfunded liability.

The social and economic benefits of term limits on bureaucrats

With open positions, the federal government can hire talent on basis of ability, knowledge, and skills; from every part of the country. These new employees could even be located in rural and low-income areas that presently have few federal workers. One study estimated that 20% of federal positions (approximately 400,000 jobs) could be done effectively anywhere in the U.S. The study also finds that a more distributed workforce can combat “widening geographic inequality.”

As work is created in economically depressed areas, it will generate economic opportunities for these areas by attracting other professionals wanting to provide services to the federal operations located there. By working in lower-cost areas, the federal government can reduce its cost-of-living adjustments from 30.5% in high-cost areas like Washington, DC to 16% in most of the U.S. While the federal government saves money, so does the employee living in low-cost areas.

More importantly, with federal employees spread throughout the U.S., the federal government will be closer to the governed. Citizens in every part of the U.S. will be able to interact with federal employees and understand them better. Moreover, by being distributed over 50 states, the federal employees will learn about the needs of Americans in fly-over country and state and local government. Over time this should help restore trust in government.

The lifers in the federal bureaucracy certainly have taken “advantage of the pandemic. Unfortunately, the only thing those managing the federal workforce know about its workers is where to send the paycheck. To integrate the federal government into the nation, Congress needs to reorganize the federal workforce.

The starting point to reorganizing the massive federal workforce is term limits on bureaucrats.

William L. Kovacs is the author of Reform the Kakistocracy, the winner of the 2021 Independent Press Award for Political/Social Change. Mr. Kovacs has served as senior vice-president for the US Chamber of Commerce, chief counsel to a congressional committee, and a partner in law DC law firms.

  • Home
  • Term Limits for Bureaucrats!

Term Limits for Bureaucrats!

William L. Kovacs

January 2020

Term Limits for Bureaucrats!

Should any American have a property right to a federal job for life?

Citizens elect the House of Representatives every two years; Senators ever six years. The President every four years. Elections are the primary mechanisms citizens have to hold government accountable.

Unfortunately, behind this façade of Democracy are two million bureaucrats (or civil servants as they prefer to be called), who burrow into government positions for most of their careers. These bureaucrats control the spin on information given elected officials. In foreign affairs, these bureaucrats replace the President’s policy with policies adopted by interagency working groups. They write the hundreds of thousands of regulations, few of us read, but control our lives. Bureaucrats determine who of us acts lawfully or unlawfully.

The impact of bureaucrats is massive; scandals at the FBI, Justice, State, ranging from destruction of information, to selling guns to Mexican gangs to kill Americans. All happening without any accountability!

A  USA Today’s headline read “Many Federal Employees More Likely to Die Than Be Fired.” It reported that federal employees were fired at the rate of 0.55%, a rate so low that deaths outnumbered firings. Two significant agencies had zero firings.

In addition to job security, the Congressional Budget Office found pay and benefits for bureaucrats 47% more than the combined pay and benefits in the private sector. A Cato Institute study put the number at 80% more than the private sector. The average federal worker receives $123,160 in pay and benefits compared to $69,901 in the private sector.

On top of better pay and benefits, a Heritage Foundation analysis found federal employees work fewer hours a week than their private sector counterparts, 38.7 to 41.4 hours.

The  federal government must get the “best and brightest” since 99.5% of the 2 million federal employees receive a “fully successful” rating, or above, on their evaluations? Of the 2 million bureaucrats, only 0.1% received unacceptable ratings.

The cost of these federal bureaucrats is massive. Presently, there is $3.5 trillion in unfunded pension and health benefits.

Let’s ask the question again. Should any American have a property right to a federal job for life?

How did this happen?

Civil Service starts in 1883 with the Pendleton Act requiring a competitive examination for many government positions. By requiring hiring based on the highest scores, Congress was eliminating political patronage. While only the top prospects were to be selected, the Pendleton Act did not protect government employees from being fired. In 1962, President Kennedy signed an Executive Order allowing federal employees a right to appeal a firing. In 1974 President Nixon issued another Executive Order ensuring an automatic right of appeal to an independent authority.

As appeals reached the courts, decisions were inconsistent. Over time the competitive exam was stuck down by the courts, part-by-part. In 1978, Congress enacted the Civil Service Reform Act making the Executive Orders statutory and authorizing unions to collectively bargain with the federal government. The Supreme Court interpreted the new law as requiring trial-type hearings, making it almost impossible to dismiss a federal employee.

Another impact of “life-time jobs for bureaucrats” is that it fundamentally changes the role of the President. Article II requires the President to execute the laws of the U.S., yet the President controls only 4000 appointments out of 2 million positions. 99.8% percent of the bureaucracy beats to its own drummer. Many of these highly paid elites, believe “the public knows little or nothing” about issues facing the nation.

Over time the public lost trust in government. In 1958 almost seventy-five percent of Americans trusted government. By 2013 only 28% of Americans had a favorable view of it.

Action

Other than dramatically shrinking government, the options for changing the bureaucracy are limited. Eliminating all civil service protections returns the nation to a spoils system. Hiring more political appointees expands the bureaucracy. Congress is weak at fact-intensive oversight. Moreover, it is unlikely that the protections can be eliminated due to strong union support. This leaves term limits as a practical solution.

In a major 1926 policy speech, Calvin Coolidge warned:

Unless bureaucracy is constantly resisted it breaks down representative government and overwhelms democracy. It…sets up the pretense of having authority over everybody and being responsible to nobody…”

Term limits on bureaucrats would have three major benefits for our country.

First, term limits break bureaucrat control of government by eliminating the power imbalance between elected officials whose service can regularly be limited by citizens and an unaccountable bureaucracy that can hold jobs for life.

Second, with term limits, a greater number of Americans will be able to serve their country.

Finally, term limits, by reducing the number of bureaucrats qualifying for federal benefits, results in major reductions in unfunded federal benefits.

It’s a modest proposal, but it is a start.